| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2008;23:250. A more recent version of this article appeared on July 1, 2008
A Microcosting Study of Intensive Care Unit Stay in the Netherlands
1 Erasmus MC University Medical Center institute for Medical Technology Assessment
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: s.s.tan{at}erasmusmc.n.
1911, with labour (33%) and indirect costs (33%) as the most important cost drivers. An ordinary least squares analysis including age, Nine Equivalent of Nursing Manpower Use score/Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System score, mechanical ventilation, blood products, and renal replacement therapy was able to predict 50% of the daily intensive care unit costs.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1911, with labour (33%) and indirect costs (33%) as the most important cost drivers. An ordinary least squares analysis including age, Nine Equivalent of Nursing Manpower Use score/Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System score, mechanical ventilation, blood products, and renal replacement therapy was able to predict 50% of the daily intensive care unit costs.